Overviews
- Advertising Law Terms
- Advertising Law
- Advisory Opinions
- Bureau Enforcement
- CASL (Anti-spam Law)
- CASL Compliance
- CASL Compliance Errors
- CASL Compliance Tips
- CASL FAQs – I
- CASL FAQs – II
- CASL Law Terms – A-M
- CASL Law Terms – N-Z
- CASL Precedents
- Competition Act Amendments
- Competition Bureau Complaints
- Competition Law
- Competition Law Terms
- Complaints
- Compliance
- Contests
- Contests and CASL
- Contests and Quebec
- Contest Forms/Precedents – I
- Contest Forms/Precedents – II
- Contest Law FAQs
- Contest Law Terms – A-C
- Contest Law Terms – D-H
- Contest Law Terms – I-M
- Contest Law Terms – N-S
- Contest Law Terms – T-Z
- Contests and Social Media
- Contest Law Tips
- Deceptive Prize Notices
- Disclaimers
- Drip Pricing
- General Impression Test
- Green Claims
- Influencer/Co-Sponsor Agreements
- Influencer Marketing
- Internet Advertising
- Made in Canada Claims
- MAP Policies
- Market Studies
- Misleading Advertising
- Misleading Advertising FAQs
- OSP Claims/Sales
- Packaging and Labelling
- Performance Claims
- Price Claims
- Quotes
- Rebates
- Regulated Conduct Defence
- Reprisal Actions
- Scarcity Cues
- Testimonials and Endorsements
- Trip/Destination Contests
- Contact
- Terms of Use
Categories
Archives
Tag Archives: consent agreement
January 7, 2022
Keurig To Pay $3.8 Million Settlement In Misleading Advertising K-Cup Recyclability Case
On January 6, 2022, the Competition Bureau (Bureau) announced that it had negotiated a consent agreement with Keurig Canada Inc. (Keurig) regarding concerns over allegedly false or misleading recyclability claims on its website, social media platforms, texts and logos for its single-use coffee pods (K-Cup … Read the rest of this entry »
November 21, 2020
Hockey Helmet Performance Claims Case Illustrates Competition Act Compliance Requirements
Practical Law Canada Competition (of which I am Lawyer Editor) has published a new Legal Update, which discusses recent enforcement by the Competition Bureau against an ice hockey helmet manufacturer in relation to allegedly unsupported performance claims. The Legal Update includes an overview of the … Read the rest of this entry »
February 14, 2020
The Price, the Whole Price and Nothing But the Price: StubHub Pays $1.3 Million Penalty Following Bureau Drip Pricing Probe
The Competition Bureau’s (Bureau) top priority for enforcement and advocacy is currently the digital economy (see, for example, here, here, here, here and here). And for online marketing practices, false or misleading prices, including drip-pricing (i.e., where additional fees for an online purchase are only … Read the rest of this entry »
June 27, 2019
Ticketmaster Agrees to Pay $4 Million Penalty to Settle Drip Pricing Case (Upfront Pricing Case)
On June 27, 2019, the Competition Bureau (Bureau) announced that Ticketmaster L.L.C., TNow Entertainment Group, Inc. and Ticketmaster Canada LP have agreed to pay a $4 million penalty and $500,000 of the Bureau’s costs relating to allegedly misleading online ticket sale pricing claims. See Ticketmaster to … Read the rest of this entry »
June 25, 2013
Competition Bureau Cracks Down on Advertiser in First Criminal Breach of Registered Consent Order Case
Earlier today the Competition Bureau announced that an Alberta man has been found guilty of misleading advertising under the federal Competition Act and of a breach of a consent agreement under the Act (see: Alberta Man Found Guilty of Misleading Representations and Breach of Consent … Read the rest of this entry »
