Overviews
- Advertising Law Terms
- Advertising Law
- Advisory Opinions
- Bureau Enforcement
- CASL (Anti-spam Law)
- CASL Compliance
- CASL Compliance Errors
- CASL Compliance Tips
- CASL FAQs – I
- CASL FAQs – II
- CASL Law Terms – A-M
- CASL Law Terms – N-Z
- CASL Precedents
- Competition Act Amendments
- Competition Bureau Complaints
- Competition Law
- Competition Law Terms
- Complaints
- Compliance
- Contests
- Contests and CASL
- Contests and Quebec
- Contest Forms/Precedents – I
- Contest Forms/Precedents – II
- Contest Law FAQs
- Contest Law Terms – A-C
- Contest Law Terms – D-H
- Contest Law Terms – I-M
- Contest Law Terms – N-S
- Contest Law Terms – T-Z
- Contests and Social Media
- Contest Law Tips
- Deceptive Prize Notices
- Disclaimers
- Drip Pricing
- General Impression Test
- Green Claims
- Influencer/Co-Sponsor Agreements
- Influencer Marketing
- Internet Advertising
- Made in Canada Claims
- MAP Policies
- Market Studies
- Misleading Advertising
- Misleading Advertising FAQs
- OSP Claims/Sales
- Packaging and Labelling
- Performance Claims
- Price Claims
- Quotes
- Rebates
- Regulated Conduct Defence
- Reprisal Actions
- Scarcity Cues
- Testimonials and Endorsements
- Trip/Destination Contests
- Contact
- Terms of Use
Categories
Archives
Tag Archives: rogers
Four Year Mobile Cramming Case Ends With $11 Million Bell, Trade Association Settlements
Earlier today, the Competition Bureau (Bureau) announced two final settlements in its four-year year litigation against Canada’s major telecoms and the Canadian Wireless Telecommunications Association (CWTA). See: Bell customers to receive up to $11.82 million as part of Competition Bureau agreement. In making the announcement, … Read the rest of this entry »
Canadian Court Takes Measured Approach to Imposing $500,000 Civil Fine Against Rogers in Performance Claims Case
In an interesting and important decision issued by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice on February 21st, the Court has now imposed a $500,000 civil administrative monetary penalty (“AMP”) against Rogers for failing to have performed adequate and proper testing in some Canadian markets for … Read the rest of this entry »
Rogers Largely Wins Landmark Chatr Misleading Advertising and Performance Claims Case
Earlier today the Competition Bureau announced the fairly long-awaited decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (per Marrocco J.) in the Rogers Chatr misleading advertising and performance claims case (Canada (Competition Bureau) v. Chatr Wireless Inc., 2013 ONSC 5315 (Ont. Sup. Ct.)). In announcing … Read the rest of this entry »
Canadian Competition Law – 2012 Year in Review I – Misleading Advertising
Steve Szentesi & Kevin Wright (Davis LLP) Extract from a chapter to be published in CLEBC’s Annual Review of Law & Practice – 2013 ____________________ 2012 was a busy year for Canadian competition and foreign investment law, with significant developments in all major areas including … Read the rest of this entry »
CRTC Announces Public Consultations on New Mandatory Wireless Code
In the second of two recent major announcements (the first being yesterday’s release of the CRTC’s inaugural guidelines under Canada’s impending anti-spam legislation – see: here), Canada’s telecom regulator today announced public consultations on a new mandatory wireless code. The thrust of the new consultations appears … Read the rest of this entry »
Competition Bureau Sues Canadian Telecoms for $31 Million and Restitution: Alleged Misleading Price Claims for “Premium Texting Services”
In what can only be described as a growing war against telecom advertising in Canada, the Competition Bureau announced on September 14, 2012 that it began proceedings in Ontario Superior Court against Bell Canada (“Bell”), Rogers Communications (“Rogers”), TELUS Corporation (“TELUS”) and the Canadian Wireless … Read the rest of this entry »